Will VAWA sponsor Joe Biden campaign with wife-beater Charlie Wilson in OH-06?
…which is why, of course, I am asking it. The background… comes in three parts: Vice President Joe Biden, when he was Senator Joe Biden, happened to be a sponsor of the Violence Against Women Act. We’ll pass to one side for a moment the current (as in, this week) controversy over the latest iteration of the law – it’s up for reauthorization – to specifically note, again, that this was Biden’s baby, as it were. Charlie Wilson is known mostly for three things (four, if you count the fact that he’s often confused with the infinitely better Democratic Charlie Wilson from Texas); he was the former Congressman from OH-06; Charlie Wilson of Ohio is an admitted wife-beater ; and Charlie Wilson of Ohio is unaccountably running for Congress again . Guess where Joe Biden will be stumping for the President, this week? That’s right! OH-06! Also OH-17 (Youngstown), but Thursday Biden will be making a speech Thursday at an auto dealership in Martin’s Ferry . Which, as has been privately pointed out to me, leads to a fascinating set of questions. Will Charlie Wilson be making an appearance at this event? If Wilson does show, will we be treated to the spectacle of seeing the Vice President and sponsor of anti-spousal abuse legislation praise a guy who was a poster child for why we might have needed the legislation in the first place? If Wilson does not show, will the administration come clean about why the wife-beater wasn’t invited to his party’s own in-district campaign event? In either case, will the press bring up the inherent rhetorical contradictions that this entire scenario represents? No, wait, I know the answer to that last one already. Moe Lane ( crosspost ) PS: Hey, you know something? Bill Johnson (R, OH-06) STILL doesn’t beat his wife!
More:
Will VAWA sponsor Joe Biden campaign with wife-beater Charlie Wilson in OH-06?
Obama’s Fear of Hannity, and Wright Hush Money
As the 2008 November election loomed, it appears that then-Senator Barack Obama was traumatized — by Sean Hannity. Author Edward Klein, whose new Obama book The Amateur is just out, has a startling piece in Sunday’s New York Post . As revealing for what it says as for who it doesn’t mention. Klein had interviewed the president’s controversial ex-pastor the Reverend Jeremiah Wright for the book. Wright claims he was offered $150,000 by an Obama supporter to silence himself during the presidential campaign. And that there was a secret meeting between Obama and Wright that took place in the parsonage of the Trinity United Church of Christ, a meeting in which Obama asked Wright to stop preaching sermons until after the November, 2008 elections. Wrote Klein in The Post, beginning with a direct quote from Wright: “Man, the media ate me alive,” Wright told me when we met in his office at Chicago’s Kwame Nkrumah Academy. “After the media went ballistic on me, I received an e-mail offering me money not to preach at all until the November presidential election.” “Who sent the e-mail?” I asked Wright. “It was from one of Barack’s closest friends.” “He offered you money?” “Not directly,” Wright said. “He sent the offer to one of the members of the church, who sent it to me.” “How much money did he offer you?” “One hundred and fifty thousand dollars,” Wright said. “Did Obama himself ever make an effort to see you?” “Yes,” Wright said. “Barack said he wanted to meet me in secret, in a secure place. And I said, ‘You’re used to coming to my home, you’ve been here countless times, so what’s wrong with coming to my home?’ So we met in the living room of the parsonage of Trinity United Church of Christ, at South Pleasant Avenue right off 95th Street, just Barack and me. I don’t know if he had a wire on him. His security was outside somewhere. “And one of the first things Barack said was, ‘I really wish you wouldn’t do any more public speaking until after the November election.’ He knew I had some speaking engagements lined up, and he said, ‘I wish you wouldn’t speak. It’s gonna hurt the campaign if you do that.’ “And what did you say?” I asked. “I said, ‘I don’t see it that way. And anyway, how am I supposed to support my family?’ And he said, ‘Well, I wish you wouldn’t speak in public. The press is gonna eat you alive. “Barack said, ‘I’m sorry you don’t see it the way I do. Do you know what your problem is?’ And I said, ‘No, what’s my problem?’ And he said, ‘You have to tell the truth.’ I said, ‘That’s a good problem to have. That’s a good problem for all preachers to have. That’s why I could never be a politician.’ “And he said, ‘It’s going to get worse if you go out there and speak. It’s really going to get worse.’ “And he was so right” Two points. An offer of hush money that appears to be connected in some fashion with an Obama donor? Is this not exactly what former North Carolina Senator John Edwards is on trial for as we speak? The use of campaign donor money as hush money for his mistress? What’s the difference, in terms of campaign finance laws, between using campaign donor money to silence a mistress and a minister? Second point. While neither Wright nor Klein mention it here…who specifically was “the media” that both Wright and Obama were so concerned about? When Obama said ” The press is gonna eat you alive” — who exactly in the press was he talking about? That’s right. It was none other than our friend Sean Hannity. The same Sean Hannity who first brought Reverend Wright to national attention through writer Erik Rush — and then brought Wright on Hannity and Colmes . Hannity was relentless in bringing Wright’s controversial sermons (like this one , Wright’s infamous “Goddamn America!” sermon) to national attention — while the mainstream media was quiet as a church mouse. Eventually ABC’s Brian Ross woke up to the controversy, but it was Hannity who took the heat — tons of it — for repeatedly exploring the potential links between Wright’s far-left Black Liberation Theology, socialism and a would-be Obama administration. Now, according to Klein, we know that Obama himself was so concerned about what was in fact Hannity’s continuous reporting on Wright that the then-Senator personally had a secret sit-down with Wright to ask his pastor to, well, shut-up. Again. Campaign donor hush money offer to Jeremiah Wright? Who else from Obama’s past did the campaign or its donor friends try and hush with big bucks? And who took it? And what is the difference between mistress hush money and minister hush money?
Read more here:
Obama’s Fear of Hannity, and Wright Hush Money
Dem Senator Challenges Mooch To a Sack Race For Some Unknown Reason…
Word of caution to Senator Warner, Mooch doesn’t take losing gently. HT: Charlie Spiering
Read more here:
Dem Senator Challenges Mooch To a Sack Race For Some Unknown Reason…
On Tuesday, we noted that there would be many important spending cutting amendment offered on the floor to the Commerce, Justice, and Science bill (H.R. 5326). Well, a number of conservatives offered amendments to cut or eliminate wasteful, harmful, and unconstitutional programs. Most notably, we focused on Mike Pompeo’s amendment to eliminate the stimulus program – Economic Development Administration. The House defeated most of them, and in doing so, turned away about $4 billion more in spending cuts. See how many of them were supported by your member of Congress. Remember that those who are unwilling to eliminate these relatively small programs and agencies are not likely to have the guts to enact entitlement reform. On Wednesday, Senator Thune told Politico : “It’s the environment we’re living in right now. There are lots of folks who are watching every member’s voting records; you’re not only going to be attacked by your opponent on the Democrat side, but there are obviously Republicans out there who may not like when you’ve been around a few years and you got a lot of votes.” Thune is correct. We are spotlighting voting records, and it is clearly working. Although most of the spending cut amendment failed this week, most of them garnered support from more than half the conference. Here are the results from some of the key amendments: Pompeo Amendment to abolish the Economic Development Administration [ roll call #207 ] Broun amendment that would cut 3% from salaries and expenses accounts covered in the bill and direct $874.6 million to the bill’s spending reduction account. [ Roll call #203 ] McClintock amendment that would cut $277.8 million from wasteful and protectionist programs in the International Trade Administration. [Roll call #204 ] Scalise amendment that would reduce funding for Economic Development Administration salaries and expenses by $7.5 million and also reduce funding for the Commerce Department’s management account by $10.7 million. The amendment would direct $18.2 million to the spending reduction account. [ roll call #206 ] Quayle amendment that would cut $21 million provided for industrial technology services at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). [ roll call #208 ] Harris amendment that would cut $542,000 from global warming programs at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) [ roll call #209 ] Passed Broun amendment that cut $15 million for expenses associated with the restoration of Pacific salmon populations [ roll call #211 ] Grimm amendment that would increase funding for the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Program by $126 million. This is another federal intrusion into law enforcement that has not shown successful results. [ roll call #214 ] Passed Flake amendment that would cut $1.2 billion from the National Science Foundation. [ roll call #217 ] Scott, R-Ga., amendment to abolish Legal Services Corp.[ roll call #219 ] Broun amendment that would cut 12.2% from the entire bill. [ roll call #222 ] Cross-posted from The Madison Project

The rest is here:
Vote Roundup from CJS Appropriations Bill
Indiana Hocks a Lugar
We here at RedState were the first national site to endorse Richard Mourdock. We had him at last year’s RedState Gathering. I am personally a big fan. Tonight, we’d like to congratulate him on his huge win in Indiana against Richard Lugar. We still have the general election to win, but things are looking good. Congrats Mr. Treasurer! Be sure to chip in for his general election fun d. Even Senator Lugar has already come out on board now and said he’ll support Mourdock.
Read this article:
Indiana Hocks a Lugar