RINO Scott Brown Embraces Obama In Reelection Bid
RINO Scott Brown Embraces Obama In Reelection Bid
View post:
RINO Scott Brown Embraces Obama In Reelection Bid
OWS-Founder Elizabeth Warren Says She’s Not In The 1% Despite Being Worth $14.5 Million…
God help us if she’s elected to the Senate, which is a very real possibility considering Scott Brown’s weakness in the polls. (BuzzFeed) — The rhetoric of class and inequality is back in force, and Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren — the standard-bearer for a combative new progressivism — made the case to MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell
See more here:
OWS-Founder Elizabeth Warren Says She’s Not In The 1% Despite Being Worth $14.5 Million…
No Cash From Conservatives
Does Scott Brown have a Tea Party problem? For the second straight quarter, the Republican senator from Massachusetts has been outraised by his likely Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren. Brown isn’t exactly in the poorhouse. He raised a respectable $3.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2011 and his $12.8 million cash on hand is more than double Warren’s. But Warren’s impressive $5.7 million haul over the last three months of 2011 is 50 percent higher than Brown’s fundraising over the same period. The cash came in handy for a $1.6 million television ad buy in December. While Warren touts her support from small donors — she has reported that the average contribution to her campaign is just $64 — in the past she has raised up to 70 percent of her campaign moolah from out-of-state donors. Some of these donors could be from Wall Street firms that benefit from federal bailouts. Warren told the Boston Herald last week that she was accepting donations from Wall Streeters who “want reform.” The best way to prove you want reform, naturally, is to vote with your dollars for Elizabeth Warren. Warren has also become a genuine phenomenon among grassroots liberals across the country. She is both a darling of and an intellectual influence behind the Occupy Wall Street movement (despite earnings that make her a member of the 1 percent ). Many fervently hoped Warren would be appointed head of the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. She’s collecting lots of money from liberal voters who would now like her to hold a different job: United States senator. Just a year ago, it was Scott Brown who was collecting vast sums of money from conservatives nationwide who hoped claiming Ted Kennedy’s old Senate seat — and securing the 41st vote necessary to sustain filibusters — would halt the Obamacare juggernaut. That was then, this is now. The president’s health care bill became law despite Brown’s opposition. “He had his uses,” a correspondent wrote to me about the disparity between Brown and Warren’s recent fundraising. “Tea Partiers needed him and he needed us.” Brown has since angered many of the out-of-state conservatives who sent money to his campaign with his support for Planned Parenthood and the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” Brown also voted for Dodd-Frank and backed President Obama’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray for the CFPB post once intended for Warren. Tea Party Nation founder Judson Phillips accused Brown of throwing conservatives “under the bus” and said the senator was motivated primarily by “self-preservation and self-promotion.” “I think there will be a primary challenge,” Greater Boston Tea Party president Christen Varley predicted in late 2010. No serious primary challenger has emerged, nor is one likely to. Even many of Brown’s critics acknowledge that his independent streak is designed to be competitive in Massachusetts’ tough political environment. Brown will be running for reelection at the same time as Obama, who is likely to carry the commonwealth even if former Gov. Mitt Romney is the Republican presidential nominee. On Election Day Brown will need Massachusetts’ unaffiliated voters more than Tea Party sympathizers living far from New England. Where the drop-off in conservative support could hurt Brown, however, is in out-of-state fundraising. Brown can’t count on the kind of outside help he enjoyed in the special election, while Warren is holding successful money bombs. Conservative money will flow to other Republican candidates in the busy 2012 election cycle and Warren will be the new sensation. Crossroads GPS has done some advertising in Massachusetts — Warren has called the group’s adviser Karl Rove Brown’s “wing man” — though Brown isn’t encouraging third party ads. Many grassroots conservatives seem at best indifferent to Brown’s fate this time around, however. Scott Brown is the rare Massachusetts Republican who has never lost an election. He knows how to win in hostile territory and under difficult circumstances. But this time around, some conservatives won’t lift a finger to help him even if necessary to keep an Occupy ally out of the Senate. Brown will have to concentrate on the late Bay Stater Tip O’Neill’s maxim that all politics is local instead.
Read the original post:
No Cash From Conservatives
Elizabeth Warren Again Outraises Scott Brown
Scott Brown, probably the most vulnerable incumbent Republican senator, is going to have a real fight on his hands in Massachusetts. Democrat Elizabeth Warren raised $5.7 million to Brown’s $3.2 million in the fourth quarter, marking the second quarter in wich Warren outraised Brown. Warren, a liberal darling, does have less cash on hand than Brrown’s $12. 8 million. Brown, who holds the Senate seat that once belonged to Ted Kennedy, will kick off his reelection bid tomorrow, two years after beating Martha Coakley in a special election.
Read the original:
Elizabeth Warren Again Outraises Scott Brown
Elizabeth Warren’s inaccurate Karl Rove whining.
So let me set the background, here. Crossroads GPS is a 501(c)(4) associated with American Crossroads (a 527 advocacy group which has Karl Rove advising it; this will be important later), and it put out this ad on Massachusetts Senate hopeful Elizabeth Warren (who is running, of course, against Republican Senator Scott Brown ). Said ad helpfully points out that Warren was up to her eyeballs assisting the 2008 TARP bailout – yes, the same bailout that she’s now trying to be a class warrior against : Summation of the video: Elizabeth Warren talks a good game, but she was involved in TARP, in a supervisory role – so if people don’t like the way that TARP unfolded, blame her . The ad alludes to the way that Warren sucked up to the Chamber of Commerce in order to try to get support to be made the formal head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Moving away from the ad: Warren also tried that with the 2010 crop of freshmen House Republicans , with about the same amount of success. On the other hand, Warren did manage to put into place the man who would eventually succeed her as chief CFPB bureaucrat… one Raj Date , former executive at Capital One and Deutsche Bank. All in all, this is all pretty standard, somewhat interchangeable Washington insider (Democratic edition) stuff from Warren. Nothing special, alas. Now, at this point somebody’s going to complain that Warren was critical of the TARP program when she was (honestly, not very effectively) overseeing it. To which the only necessary response is a shrug and the observation that Lefty radicals typically break down into two types: those who believe that the system is damaged, and needs repair; and those who believe that the system is broken, and needs replacement. Elizabeth Warren was fine when she was timidly taking the first position on TARP; but now that she’s brassily taking the second… well, it’s not Crossroads GPS’s fault that the woman voluntarily became part of the System and now wants to pretend that she wasn’t. Revolution isn’t a part-time business, Elizabeth. Anyway, all of this apparently upset Ms. Warren in that special way that is reserved for academic lefties who suddenly discover that the real world actually scores your performance , not your intentions – so she lashed back out at Karl Rove . No, not because Karl Rove’s a standard, if somewhat dated, devil figure among the American academic left… well, not just because of that. It’s also because Elizabeth Warren apparently thinks that “Karl Rove was part of the inner circle when President Bush pushed for TARP bailouts.” ” Inner circle.” Oh, my. In point of fact, by the time that the financial crisis/TARP bailouts rolled around – which is to say, the late summer of 2008 – Karl Rove had been out of the Bush administration for over a year and was acting as a political commentator. In fact, I have been looking around for a couple of days, and I am not finding any real indication that Karl Rove was involved in the TARP bailout at all – or, at least, not involved from the inside. Which is of course not something that you can say about Warren. Now, I get that Elizabeth Warren would very much like people to hear the word ‘TARP’ and not immediately associate it with her drawing a six figure salary off of… well, I’m sure that she did something while she was there, although I couldn’t begin to tell you what it was. And I’m equally sure that Warren would like the radicals sullenly buzzing around her cronies in the Democratic Establishment to become happy little worker bees for her campaign – and never mind that the woman’s annual salary lately easily puts her in 1% territory. So I understand the need to distance Elizabeth Warren v. 2011 from Elizabeth Warren v. 2008. But… can we have a little basic accuracy, here? Not checking to see when Karl Rove resigned from the White House is not quite at Martha Coakley-levels of basic campaign idiocy, but you can see her house from there. Moe Lane ( crosspost )
Read the rest here:
Elizabeth Warren’s inaccurate Karl Rove whining.