Via Truth Revolt: In the aftermath of Brandeis University’s decision to revoke Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s offer of an honorary degree and scheduled speaking engagement, CAIR National issued a statement claiming victory. Among the listed “specific thanks” was racist blogger Richard Silverstein. Silverstein has come under his fire for calling Chloe Valdary, an African-American pro-Israel activist, […]
Continue reading here:
CAIR Thanks Racist Blogger For His Support Against Ayaan Hirsi Ali…
This is the best, if least dramatic, theory I have read on the disappearance of the Malaysian airliner: There has been a lot of speculation about Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Terrorism, hijacking, meteors. I cannot believe the analysis on CNN; it’s almost disturbing. I tend to look for a simpler explanation, and I find it with the 13,000-foot runway at Pulau Langkawi. We know the story of MH370: A loaded Boeing 777 departs at midnight from Kuala Lampur, headed to Beijing. A hot night. A heavy aircraft. About an hour out, across the gulf toward Vietnam, the plane goes dark, meaning the transponder and secondary radar tracking go off. Two days later we hear reports that Malaysian military radar (which is a primary radar, meaning the plane is tracked by reflection rather than by transponder interrogation response) has tracked the plane on a southwesterly course back across the Malay Peninsula into the Strait of Malacca. The left turn is the key here. Zaharie Ahmad Shah1 was a very experienced senior captain with 18,000 hours of flight time. We old pilots were drilled to know what is the closest airport of safe harbor while in cruise. Airports behind us, airports abeam us, and airports ahead of us. They’re always in our head. Always. If something happens, you don’t want to be thinking about what are you going to do–you already know what you are going to do. When I saw that left turn with a direct heading, I instinctively knew he was heading for an airport. He was taking a direct route to Palau Langkawi, a 13,000-foot airstrip with an approach over water and no obstacles. The captain did not turn back to Kuala Lampur because he knew he had 8,000-foot ridges to cross. He knew the terrain was friendlier toward Langkawi, which also was closer. But what went wrong? The pilot has a simple answer: a fire. For me, the loss of transponders and communications makes perfect sense in a fire. And there most likely was an electrical fire. In the case of a fire, the first response is to pull the main busses and restore circuits one by one until you have isolated the bad one. If they pulled the busses, the plane would go silent. It probably was a serious event and the flight crew was occupied with controlling the plane and trying to fight the fire. Aviate, navigate, and lastly, communicate is the mantra in such situations. There are two types of fires. An electrical fire might not be as fast and furious, and there may or may not be incapacitating smoke. However there is the possibility, given the timeline, that there was an overheat on one of the front landing gear tires, it blew on takeoff and started slowly burning. Yes, this happens with underinflated tires. Remember: Heavy plane, hot night, sea level, long-run takeoff. There was a well known accident in Nigeria of a DC8 that had a landing gear fire on takeoff. Once going, a tire fire would produce horrific, incapacitating smoke. Yes, pilots have access to oxygen masks, but this is a no-no with fire. Most have access to a smoke hood with a filter, but this will last only a few minutes depending on the smoke level. (I used to carry one in my flight bag, and I still carry one in my briefcase when I fly.) What I think happened is the flight crew was overcome by smoke and the plane continued on the heading, probably on George (autopilot), until it ran out of fuel or the fire destroyed the control surfaces and it crashed. You will find it along that route–looking elsewhere is pointless. I think this is the right answer by default until someone proves otherwise. It makes sense. It is simple and not outlandish. Won’t sell many papers, though. AH HELL IT WAS PROBABLY A TERRORIST HIJACKING LET’S ALL PANIC AAAUUUGGGHHH!!!!!! UPDATE: Many commenters say this scenario is inconsistent with the voice transmissions. Could be. I don’t claim to be an expert on this. I just tend to look for the simplest explanation that explains the facts. If that’s not this theory, then so be it.
Charlie, just say I made a mistake and move on. Via Politico: The New York Democrat was referencing comments he made to a New York NBC affiliate on Wednesday morning as the fire raged and details began to trickle out that the situation was the most “horrific” thing that had befallen his district in his 22 […]
See the original post here:
Charlie Rangel Doubles Down On Comment Comparing Harlem Gas Explosion To 9/11…
Update to this story. Georgia Tech graduate student Saamer Akhshabi was injured in an explosion/fire Tuesday afternoon that burnt over 90% of his body. Police said the fire was possibly due to an incendiery device, that at least one molotov cocktails and bottles of gas and kerosene were found at the grad student’s apartment. The […]