The Day Ahead: Wednesday, February 23, 2011
What to watch for: Progressives plan protests across the country in support of Wisconsin public unions ( ABC ) Dallas mayor Tom Leppert to step down, thought to be eyeing Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison’s seat ( Dallas Morning News ) Congress out of session On this day in 1943, the American flag was raised on Iwo Jima ( History.com ) On the main site: Once a Mad Dog, by Roger Kaplan: Muammar al-Gaddafi will not be missed — but his durability remains a reproach to the West. Wisconsin Showdown , by Peter Ferrara: Newt Gingrich and Jeb Bush are right about state bankruptcy as one way to deal with rapacious government unions. Obama’s Disengager , by the Prowler: Tom Donilon, as the last two weeks have confirmed, lacks foreign policy vision. Fleeting Beauty , by Ben Stein: It’s always something. Britain’s Defense Collapse Continues , by Hal G.P. Colebatch: David Cameron will soon be traveling without a military escort. Spend Rifts , by Grover Norquist: A new addition to the Reagan Republican list of non-negotiables. Public Sector Unions and Basic Morality , by Manon McKinnon: If words having meaning, public employee unions do not. Clip of the day: Wisconsin governor Scott Walker on everything:
View post:
The Day Ahead: Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Kay Bailey Hutchison Won’t Run for Reelection
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) has announced she will not seek another term in 2012. “I have known since 2006 that I wouldn’t seek another term,” the senator told the Dallas Morning News . “I wanted to announce it on my own terms and in my own way.” Maybe that’s true. But Hutchison badly lost a Republican primary for governor last year and was likely to face a primary challenge from Texas Railroad Commissioner Michael Williams, and possibly others, for the GOP senatorial nomination. So maybe this was the best way to go out on her own terms.
Here is the original post:
Kay Bailey Hutchison Won’t Run for Reelection
OK, OK, enough with dancing on the bar, shooting pistols in the air, and whatever else Texans are legendarily credited with doing when they celebrate. News of the state’s projected gain in congressional representation .affords opportunities for useful, not to mention sober, analysis of what makes a state really work. We’re gittin’ them four new seats, boys, due in large measure to a engrained habit of welcoming capital, capitalists, and various other proponents of growth. Population growth of 20.6 percent over the past decade has both a geographical and an economic basis. Proximity to Mexico has historically made Texas a major destination for Mexican immigrants. These immigrants come — the economic angle emerges here — because jobs in Texas are relatively plentiful. Their plentitude draws more than just Mexicans. As the Dallas Morning News ‘ Jim Landers points out, a yearly average of 80,000 Californians moved to Texas between 2006 and 2008. Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana likewise contributed to the influx, Landers says. Abundant resources — land, petroleum, and so on — create their own blessings; but a collateral blessing to Texas, in terms of creating attractions for population growth, is the state’s taste for relatively small, relatively non-oppressive government. Save for the opposite disposition in states like New York and California, Texas, with its hot summers and taste for the un-chic, might not stand out so favorably among the other states. Stand out it does. Texas doesn’t even have a personal income tax. It accords to business such latitude as comports with observance of mainstream legalities. The state legislature meets just five months out of every 24. The state’s almost uniformly liberal newspapers rag on business a bit, but few enough others do. It’s a good place, Texas is, to make a living. During the recession, housing values fell less than those in other states, and unemployment never reached 9 percent. Advantages of this sort get noised abroad, and newcomers start showing up. It is what Lenin called voting with your feet — taking yourself and your family where you expect your discrete needs to be met. For similar reasons, other states set to gain seats — Florida, especially, which is set for a two-seat pickup — are viewed as hospitable to growth. It’s hard, perhaps, to see people flocking to a state represented by Harry Reid, but Nevada — with the largest population gains of the decade in percentage terms — helps prove again the relative insignificance of people who make their living running for office. Back to Texas. The additional four congressional seats the state will receive thanks to recent census gains will increase its congressional leverage, thus aiding the general impulse to rein in government growth. Wherever the seats are sited, at least two of the new congressmen will be Republicans — which is to say, because this is Texas, conservative Republicans. This leaves one more thing to say about the next decade, politically speaking. It is that conservatives, in Texas and elsewhere, must work with great deliberation toward the incorporation in their midst of the working, striving, praying Hispanic. Of which type there are many exemplars. Life in Texas suggests as much. In November, several South Texas Hispanic Republicans won election to county posts and even the Legislature. Just days ago, a South Texas Hispanic legislator switched from the Democratic to the Republican party, where he professed to feel more at home. The notion of the Democratic Party as the logical home for Hispanics was a theme Harry Reid voiced during his reelection campaign, and for which he was rightly ridiculed. Reid will prove correct only insofar as Republicans fail to recognize the important question of illegal immigration must be sorted out intelligently, without shows of contempt and dislike for people who are going to be living among us a long time. A majority of Hispanics may not soon turn Republican, but the goal of absorbing a third or 40 percent or even more is well within Republicans’ reach. Population is, among other things, destiny. If we’re going to celebrate populational growth we have to note all its consequences. Throwing Stetsons in the air to mark prospective Republican gains is just one of the many and varied activities that presently seem indicated.
Read the rest here:
Texas Just Got Bigger
Federal Judge Rules Government Provided “Ample Evidence to Establish Association” Between CAIR, ISNA and Hamas in Holy Land Terror Case…
CAIR whines about Islamophobia in 3..2..1… (Politico) – A federal judge’s long-secret ruling that federal prosecutors violated the rights of three major American Islamic organizations and others named as unindicted co-conspirators in a Texas terrorism support case finally became public on Friday. However, publication of the ruling is a mixed blessing for the groups: the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Islamic Society of North America, and the North American Islamic Trust. That’s because U.S. District Court Judge Jorge Solis found that the government presented “ample evidence to establish the association” of the three organizations with Hamas, a Palestinian group that the U.S. has labeled as a terrorist organization and with a defunct charity convicted in the terrorism support case, the Holy Land Foundation. NAIT appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to overturn Solis’s ruling and have it unsealed. The federal appeals court recently agreed that the ruling should be unsealed and suggested that parts of it went too far, but the appeals panel refused to change it. Jason Trahan with the Dallas Morning News, who covered the Holy Land Foundation trial, posted Solis’s ruling online for the first time here . I first reported on Solis’s sealed ruling here on this blog about a year ago while it was still under wraps. Just in passing, I’d note that the New York Times reported back in August 2007 on the groups’ legal motions complaining that they’d been smeared by the federal government. The paper has yet to return to the subject. Barbarossa at Jawa who has tons more including the court ruling and a detailed breakdown .

Continued here:
Federal Judge Rules Government Provided “Ample Evidence to Establish Association” Between CAIR, ISNA and Hamas in Holy Land Terror Case…
Transcript from WFAA-TV : Impressed by his conservative views, The Dallas Morning News editorial board endorsed Stephen Broden back on October 4. But after his controversial interview with WFAA’s Brad Watson this week, they called him back to clarify what he meant by this exchange: BRODEN: “Our nation was founded on violence.” WATSON: “In 2010 you would urge that as an option, though?” BRODEN: “The option is on the table. I don’t think that we should ever remove anything from the table as relates to our liberties and our freedoms.” Speaking by telephone with the News’ William McKenzie, Broden tried to walk that statement back. McKENZIE: “Are you saying, unequivocally, that violent revolution is not on the table today?” BRODEN: “It is not on the the table today.” But by the time he made that retraction, Broden was already drawing harsh reaction from former supporters like radio host Glenn Beck. “Pastor Stephen Broden said that? That’s crazy!” Beck said. Broden blamed the statement on Watson’s interview techniques, but when pressed by The News , he agreed that there might come a time for a rebellion. BRODEN: “I believe that this is an option that is available to us as a nation, but only in the worst-case scenario, and we are nowhere near anything like that.” Instead, Broden repeatedly told The News editors that violence is not the solution BRODEN: “Let me be clear; the only way to protect liberty is through peaceable change at the ballot box.” While The Dallas Morning News may have accepted Broden’s clarifications, its editors now question his judgment. In Saturday’s paper, they are withdrawing their endorsement. They now offer no recommendation in the District 30 congressional race between Broden and Eddie Bernice Johnson. Read the original here: Broden Backtracks: Violent Revolution Is ‘Not on the Table Today’
See the original post here:
Broden Backtracks: Violent Revolution Is ‘Not on the Table Today’