<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obama&#039;s Enemies List: A Growing List of Obama&#039;s Enemies &#187; Tax Cheats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obamashitlist.com/category/tax-cheats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com</link>
	<description>Are you on OBAMASHITLIST?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Moment With Lasting Impact</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/10/12/the-moment-with-lasting-impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/10/12/the-moment-with-lasting-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cougar01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Cheats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explanation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herman-cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[once-the-sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/10/12/the-moment-with-lasting-impact/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Joining the league of people who got to the first tier, Herman Cain is now under withering fire for his 9-9-9 plan and what it&#8217;ll mean for the country. Thus far he has held his own, but he is going to have to do better. For example, saying that he&#8217;d require a 2/3 vote to repeal his plan is unconstitutional unless he somehow is able to get it stuck in the constitution as an amendment thereto. Likewise, saying the American people will keep pressure on Congress to not alter or increase the rates is not credible given that Cain and the other Republicans are fighting to repeal a health care law that Congress and the White House pushed through despite a majority of Americans opposed to it and a tea party movement energized to fight it. But that will not be the lasting impact as I suspect Herman will necessarily have to start adding more substance to his plan and overcome the historic fact that European countries, after World War II, had national sales taxes that morphed to VAT taxes because of the black market trade. European politicians, once the sales tax was introduced, made the case to the public that law abiding citizens were being taken advantage of by tax cheats and the VAT would stamp out that problem. Over time, the European sales taxes became VAT&#8217;s. The same will happen here. Again though, that&#8217;s not the lasting impact. What will last and is already percolating are those bits of sunshine between Herman Cain and the Tea Party. Herman&#8217;s support of TARP, shared with Mitt Romney, and his explanation of the theory of TARP and the implementation of TARP diverging — did it really? Opening the doors to government bailouts could come back to bite Herman with the Tea Party. Likewise, citing Alan Greenspan at this moment in time as a good Fed Chairman is not helpful. Herman is running as the tea party favorite. They love his 999 plan. Bailouts, TARP, and Greenspan may, however, be a bridge too far — especially when he has Mitt Romney agreeing with him. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/10/12/the-moment-with-lasting-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AttackWatch!</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/09/14/attackwatch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/09/14/attackwatch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IDontThinkSo0001</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Cheats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticize-the-president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irresponsibly-criticize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[make-sure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[may-well]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maybe-consider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[our-friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subversive-criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/09/14/attackwatch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Report subversive criticism of Our Leader here . If you&#8217;re so inclined, maybe consider dropping a note to our friends at the IRS as well. After all, those who irresponsibly criticize the President may well be tax cheats too. Can&#8217;t hurt to make sure! Thanks to S.J., who gets reported for telling me about it. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/09/14/attackwatch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Daily Grind: Geithner Sets a Great Example</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/05/24/the-daily-grind-geithner-sets-a-great-example/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/05/24/the-daily-grind-geithner-sets-a-great-example/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 07:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Markisacopyrightthief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Cheats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from-watching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suffered-heart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/05/24/the-daily-grind-geithner-sets-a-great-example/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Keep sending your prayers to Missouri . " Official: Palestinian PM suffered heart attack " They learned it from watching Geithner: " Tax cheats among recipients of stimulus money " ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/05/24/the-daily-grind-geithner-sets-a-great-example/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like Superglue to Stupid: Oliver Willis Believes You Can Never Criticize a (Liberal) Person of Color Even if That Person is Clearly Racist (Update:&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/05/11/like-superglue-to-stupid-oliver-willis-believes-you-can-never-criticize-a-liberal-person-of-color-even-if-that-person-is-clearly-racist-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/05/11/like-superglue-to-stupid-oliver-willis-believes-you-can-never-criticize-a-liberal-person-of-color-even-if-that-person-is-clearly-racist-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markboabaca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Cheats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united-states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/05/11/like-superglue-to-stupid-oliver-willis-believes-you-can-never-criticize-a-liberal-person-of-color-even-if-that-person-is-clearly-racist-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [Guest post by Aaron Worthing; if you have tips, please send them here .  Or by Twitter @AaronWorthing.] Update: Willis responds only by pointing out that one of these was actually a retweet. I sincerely apologize for missing that one retweet and will note that below. Now will you correct the serial falsehoods you have put out today and for your cheap use of the race card? Update (II): Common made his appearance at the White House and praised the man whom he wished hadn&#8217;t been born . And I wanted to kick myself at dinner tonight when I remembered this.   Oliver Willis himself has a history of bigotry toward an interracial couple.  You might happen to know that Michelle Malkin was born Michelle Maglalang and then married a white man with the last name Malkin.  She then did the perfectly ordinary thing and gradually took on his last name. But in Willis&#8217; mind that simple act was some kind of ethnic betrayal. He claimed her &#8220;real&#8221; name was Maglalang and accused her of ethnic whitewashing. Smilely has, ahem, whitewashed the post from his site, but an old post at Say Anything has the details. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Blogger, Twitterer and writer for Media Matters for America Oliver Willis set off a bit of a Twitter firestorm today when he tried to distract from the increasing controversy over Common’s visit to the White House. Now he claims that he never “defended” Common’s racism.  Sure he didn’t defend him.  He just wrote this , for instance [Update: That was technically a retweet.] : Fox News calls @ Common a &#8220;vile rapper&#8221; undeserving of attention. Comon&#8217;s last two movies? Date Night (Fox) and Just Wright (Fox Searchlight)* Which actually demonstrates journalistic independence between Fox News and the entertainment affiliates, but of course Willis is never going to notice that.  And later, he asserts that it is a “ non-story .”  But of course what he really wants to get to is insinuating that all of this opposition to racism is racist : conservatives BLACK have very good reasons BLACK to oppose BLACK common&#8217;s BLACK scheduled appearance BLACK at the white house BLACK But later what caught my eye was when he wrote this : the same people who have been attacking obama&#8217;s parents for their relationship are suddenly defenders of interracial relationships. wow. So I wrote back with a challenge: who has attacked Obama&#8217;s parents for having interacial relationships. name and citations, please. Now he has given no indication he has even paid attention to what I said, but someone must have asked him the same thing, because he came up with these tweets ( here and here , respectively): here&#8217;s fox news promoting an attack on the obama&#8217;s interracial marriage  http://bit.ly/jXXHzY here are some more conservative attacks on obama&#8217;s parents:  http://bit.ly/ly3knk http://bit.ly/jWix50 http://bit.ly/jFVLUb That first link was to a Media Matters post attacking not Fox News, but Fox Nation for a post linking to a Daily Mail article which is all about Obama’s father, suggesting he had bad character for having multiple wives and abandoning the future president as a child.  There isn’t a word in the article attacking their interracial marriage, period. The second link is to a post attacking Pamela Geller for knocking Obama for his “illegitimate&#8221; birth even going as far as to write: That would make the president illegitimate. In 1787, illegitimate children had different rights. There is no way the founders of this great nation intended for an illegitimate child of a foreign bigamist to attain the highest, most powerful position in the new land. All this means that President Barack Hussein Obama is not natural born. Now there is a lot to object to in what Geller wrote there.  First, actually the founders probably would have been okay with an illegitimate child becoming President.  There is a little-noticed provision in the qualifications for President that becomes particularly relevant here: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution , shall be eligible to the Office of President; (emphasis added).  Now, needless to say that emphasized passage has not been relevant for well over a hundred years, but it was relevant to the founders.  The founders could have limited that to persons born in the colonies, but they chose more expansive language because of several patriots who fought in the American revolution and otherwise served the young republic such as Alexander Hamilton.  Yes, they specifically were thinking Hamilton when they wrote that language because he was actually born in the West Indies&#8230;  to an unwed mother. Besides Geller would have us invent a new constitutional doctrine out of thin air, imagining that the founders meant to say something they didn’t actually say.  That is not how to read our Constitution. And more fundamentally I object to that term: “illegitimate.”  It stigmatizes the child for the mistakes of the parents.  If you want to condemn parent for unsafe sex outside of the context of marriage, that&#8217;s one thing,  but to hold a child accountable for the sins of the parents is just plain wrong and I consider it a serious moral failing on her part. Indeed, it is profoundly un-American to insinuate that in a nation that still proudly revels in the humble beginnings of Abraham Lincoln and declares that anyone can grow up to be President, that somehow if you have the misfortune to be born without married parents you should be categorically disqualified. But none of that has anything at all with the races of the people involved.  So we are zero for two. The next citation is to a bit on the Mike Savage show.  Now first, who cares about Savage?  Seriously who cares?  And even then they have nothing on the guy.  I am honestly shocked to write those words.  I thought that if anyone was going to say something about their interracial relationship it would be him, right?  I mean he is kind of a hateful idiot, which is why I pay no attention to him.  Well, here’s the clip: The closest that he comes to knocking her for interracial relationships is mentioning that she married two men from the “third world” and that they were Muslims.  Feel free to criticize that, but there is nothing clearly racist in that.  So Willis has actually managed to do the impossible: to defame Mike Savage. And then we get to the fourth citation, a clip from Glenn Beck, which doesn’t even mention his mother or their marriage. Seriously watch it: All he is saying is that Obama was raised by radicals.  True, false or indifferent, what does race have to do with that? So then Willis starts to get flak including one twitterer who writes : Hey @ owillis , it&#8217;s no wonder you work at tax cheats @ mmfa , you cannot back up your tweets with facts.  #SorosMonkey OMG, you have committed the cardinal sin of calling a person of color a monkey!  Because no one would ever call a white guy a SorosMonkey , right? @ EricBoehlert Stop lying about the Tea Party, you basement dweller. N-word never happened and you know it. Stop with your lies  #SorosMonkey And of course you probably know by now that Boehlert is a white guy .  You see, here is the reality.  We all as humans look like apes and monkeys.  Indeed that resemblance is a huge part of why scientists say we evolved from them.   Therefore it is common to call people of all colors to indicate disapproval.  Yes, at one time black people were uniquely singled out for that comparison, but we are past the point in time where we can assume that every time someone is called a monkey its a racial thing. But the hilarious thing about all of this is how quick Willis was to say that this was racist&#8230; i do like the con tweeters claiming theyre not racist while also describing me as a monkey.  #winning …but he never (to my knowledge) said a word of disapproval of Common’s comments.  Here he is trying to dig in into the supposed subliminal racism behind the twitterer who called him a SorosMonkey, but can’t notice nor disapprove of Common’s blatantly racist comments. He goes on to suggest that it’s okay to welcome a racist into the White House because the President was the product of an interracial marriage .  And as for Common’s anti-police lyrics , Willis explains that some of Obama’s best friends are cops.  Yes, really . If you pretended for a moment that Willis was honest you would have to conclude that Willis believes that you can never criticize a person of color for anything without being a racist—even if what you are criticizing them for is racism.  Which is itself a racist belief. But that requires you to pretend that he is honest.  We should know better by now.  This is how the game is played by too many on the left.  They try to shut down every discussion of substance by calling everyone who disagrees with them racist .  This is true even when they are pointing out that someone else is a racist.  But each false and cynical assertion of racism is a silent confession that he doesn’t believe his side can win on the issues. But even as that absolves him of the racist belief that you can never criticize a (liberal) black person for anything without being racist, the fact is Willis can only do this because the subject of criticism is black.  That may not be racism, but it is racial discrimination. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- * All twitter quotes are presented as is.  The bad grammar (including mine) are all in the originals. [Posted and authored by Aaron Worthing.] UPDATE BY PATTERICO: &#8220;[T]he media now force interracial images into the public mind and a number of perfectly rational people react to these images with an altogether natural revulsion. The white person who does not mind transacting business with a black bank clerk may yet be averse to accepting the clerk as his sisterinlaw, and THIS IS NOT RACISM, no matter what Madison Avenue, Hollywood and Washington tell us.&#8221; &#8212; R.S. McCain. If Common said that, would that be cool? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2011/05/11/like-superglue-to-stupid-oliver-willis-believes-you-can-never-criticize-a-liberal-person-of-color-even-if-that-person-is-clearly-racist-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tax Cheat Tradition Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2009/11/19/the-tax-cheat-tradition-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2009/11/19/the-tax-cheat-tradition-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markboabaca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax Cheats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assistant treasury secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lael brainerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Americans for Tax Reform: It looks like yet another Obama Treasury Department nominee has tax problems: Lael Brainerd, who is nominated to be Assistant Treasury Secretary for International Affairs. The tax flubs include: late payments on DC unemployment tax hiring a possibly illegal alien late property tax payments improperly claiming a home office deduction [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2009/11/19/the-tax-cheat-tradition-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

