<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obama&#039;s Enemies List: A Growing List of Obama&#039;s Enemies &#187; Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obamashitlist.com/category/barack-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com</link>
	<description>Are you on OBAMASHITLIST?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum: Obama Trying to Allow Iran to Have Nuke</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/santorum-obama-trying-to-allow-iran-to-have-nuke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/santorum-obama-trying-to-allow-iran-to-have-nuke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BrennanShawna20</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allow-iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama-trying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/santorum-obama-trying-to-allow-iran-to-have-nuke/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Santorum: Obama Trying to Allow Iran to Have Nuke]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/santorum-obama-trying-to-allow-iran-to-have-nuke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to Increase Spending Again</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/obama-to-increase-spending-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/obama-to-increase-spending-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apgreco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jones-newswires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/obama-to-increase-spending-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ On Monday, Obama is slated to release his annual budget proposal for FY 2013, along with a 10-year budget (2012-2021) outlook.  One would think that after talking incessantly about cutting spending, Obama would spend less money next year than this year.  Yet, in Obama&#8217;s world, a spending cut means spending less than you were slated to spend, even though it is still higher in nominal terms.  The Wall Street Journal has already obtained the outline of his budget: President Barack Obama&#8217;s budget request to Congress on Monday will forecast a deficit of $1.33 trillion in fiscal year 2012 and will include hundreds of billions of dollars of proposed infrastructure spending, according to draft documents viewed by Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal. The projected deficit is higher than the $1.296 trillion deficit in 2011 and also slightly higher than a roughly $1.15 trillion projection released by the Congressional Budget Office last week. Hence, even though revenues are projected to go up by $220 billion this year, the deficit will still tick up another $37 billion.  Using CBO&#8217;s baseline, that would mean spending will rise $257 billion this year under Obama.  And that&#8217;s during an election year.  You can imagine what he would pull out of the hat if he wins a second term. The specifics aren&#8217;t published yet, but we have these nuggets from the article: The budget includes more than $350 billion in short-term measures for job growth; a six-year, $476 billion proposal for roads and other surface-transportation projects; and more than $360 billion in savings in health programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. The budget also calls for a 5% increase in nondefense research-and-development spending over the previous year and proposes $2.2 billion for advanced manufacturing research and development—a 19% increase over 2012. Surprise! More stimulus spending, plus more top-down federally-managed transportation, not unlike the Republican proposal in the House (yeah, we&#8217;re looking at you), and almost identical to the Senate proposal, which raises taxes (supported by all Republicans except for 9).  So how does Obama plan to reduce his $1.6 trillion deficit from last year?  We&#8217;ll wait and see, but undoubtedly, it will come out of the military. Regarding the healthcare cuts, until we reform the entire healthcare system to reflect the free-market, these cuts are either notional or will squeeze Medicare patients even further. Finally, what would an Obama budget be without tax increases: The draft documents don&#8217;t include all the details of the president&#8217;s budget but show similarities to the budget plan the White House laid out in September 2011. The budget proposal, for example, repeats a call for $1.5 trillion in new revenue, mostly from ending Bush-era tax cuts for families earning more than $250,000 a year. Let&#8217;s pray with all our might that this will be Obama&#8217;s final budget. Cross-posted to The Madison Project ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/obama-to-increase-spending-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Protester Bashes Obama On Iranian State TV…</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/occupy-protester-bashes-obama-on-iranian-state-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/occupy-protester-bashes-obama-on-iranian-state-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useful idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weasel wonk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wfb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/occupy-protester-bashes-obama-on-iranian-state-tv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: When useful idiots attack their own. Via WFB]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/occupy-protester-bashes-obama-on-iranian-state-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-Life Leaders: No, Obama Didn’t “Compromise” On Birth Control Mandate…</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/pro-life-leaders-no-obama-didnt-compromise-on-birth-control-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/pro-life-leaders-no-obama-didnt-compromise-on-birth-control-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BrennanShawna20</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all-women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announced-today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth-control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs-free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forcing-religious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance-companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offer-the-drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weasel wonk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white-house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will-force]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/pro-life-leaders-no-obama-didnt-compromise-on-birth-control-mandate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not even close. WASHINGTON, February 10, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) &#8211; The White House announced today that, instead of forcing religious employers to pay for birth control, it will force insurance companies to offer the drugs free of charge to all women, no matter where they work. The plan, touted as a concession to freedom of religion ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/pro-life-leaders-no-obama-didnt-compromise-on-birth-control-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum Still Creeping In The Polls</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/santorum-still-creeping-in-the-polls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/santorum-still-creeping-in-the-polls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WhittleseyObyrne184</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santorum-still]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/santorum-still-creeping-in-the-polls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Santorum Still Creeping In The Polls]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/santorum-still-creeping-in-the-polls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catholic Bishops Respond to Obama’s Revised Contraception Mandate: Not Good Enough…</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/catholic-bishops-respond-to-obamas-revised-contraception-mandate-not-good-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/catholic-bishops-respond-to-obamas-revised-contraception-mandate-not-good-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SchoensteinNassr661</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[released-the-following]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weasel wonk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/catholic-bishops-respond-to-obamas-revised-contraception-mandate-not-good-enough/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cardinal-designate Dolan seems to think Obama is interested in negotiating, I thought it was obvious he had no further intention of altering the mandate. Time will tell. Via LifeNews: The nation’s Catholic bishops released the following statement in response to Obama’s announcement today that he is revising his pro-abortion HHS mandate. “The United States Conference of ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/catholic-bishops-respond-to-obamas-revised-contraception-mandate-not-good-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Severe Conservative Speaks at CPAC</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/a-severe-conservative-speaks-at-cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/a-severe-conservative-speaks-at-cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markboabaca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clark-kent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from-the-left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[made-it-worse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reads-on-romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thing-on-mitt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/a-severe-conservative-speaks-at-cpac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Mitt Romney got a warm reception at CPAC, standing ovations . . . the works. He did nothing to calm fears that he is not one of us. In fact, he might have made it worse today. He ad-libbed one particular portion of his speech that just may give away the game for him with the CPAC crowd. He threw in this line: &#8220;I fought against long odds in a deep blue state, but I was a severely conservative Republican governor.&#8221; What the heck is a severe conservative? The man who likes to fire people should probably fire Miriam-Webster, in addition to whoever came up with his strategy for Minnesota, Missouri, and Colorado. A severe conservative? It sounds more like a critique of conservatives from the left than that of a conservative himself. In fact, if you want to read only one thing on Mitt Romney&#8217;s views of conservatives, I actually think Chris Orr of The New Republic captures the situation best. Orr writes on Quentin Tarantion&#8217;s view of Superman as discussed in the movie Kill Bill 2 . Superman was born Superman. It&#8217;s Clark Kent that is the invented alias, the pose, the &#8220;costume.&#8221; And in the way Superman plays Kent&#8211;weak, self-doubting, cowardly&#8211;we see his critique of the human race. It occurred to me that the same is true of Romney&#8217;s desperate, if never terribly persuasive, impersonation of a conservative Republican. That persona&#8211;angry, simple-minded, xenophobic, jingoistic&#8211;is exactly what Romney (who is himself cultured, content, and cosmopolitan) imagines the average GOP voter to be. I think that is perhaps one of the most accurate reads on Romney today and why so many of us think he is not what he claims to be. Just randomly, on the actual issue of Superman, Jim Pethokoukis is correct that Quentin Tarantino got Superman wrong. I think what he means is that Mitt Romney is actually Bruce Wayne, a shallow playboy super rich businessman. ( Kidding ) ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/a-severe-conservative-speaks-at-cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s Super PAC Teamed Up With SEIU To Run Attack Ads On Romney In Florida…</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/obamas-super-pac-teamed-up-with-seiu-to-run-attack-ads-on-romney-in-florida/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/obamas-super-pac-teamed-up-with-seiu-to-run-attack-ads-on-romney-in-florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HigleyLocklear930</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[now-official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[percent-agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press-releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seiu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weasel wonk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weeks-ago]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/obamas-super-pac-teamed-up-with-seiu-to-run-attack-ads-on-romney-in-florida/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprise! Obama&#8217;s now official Super PAC, &#8220;Priorities USA&#8221; has been teaming up with the SEIU and issuing press releases peppered with Occupy codewords. WASHINGTON, D.C. &#8211; Several weeks ago, the 2.1 million-member Service Employees International Union (SEIU) declared through an endorsement of President Barack Obama and the endorsement of a 99 percent agenda, that working ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/obamas-super-pac-teamed-up-with-seiu-to-run-attack-ads-on-romney-in-florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Return of the Vichy Catholics</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/return-of-the-vichy-catholics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/return-of-the-vichy-catholics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FlodinCeglinski711</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortifacient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic-health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human-services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socioeconomic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/return-of-the-vichy-catholics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ During the legislative debate over ObamaCare, observant Catholics were stunned at the spectacle of Sister Carol Keehan, CEO of Catholic Health Association opposing the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops on the issue. The Catholic bishops accurately predicted that ObamaCare would ultimately require religious organizations to violate their own teachings in order to be in compliance. But nooooooo, said Keehan. The bishops were being irrational and engaging in fearmongering. Then came another &#8220;devout&#8221; Catholic, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sibelius who ruled that health insurance provided by Catholic organizations had to provide &#8220;reproductive health services&#8221; and suddenly Keehan found that not only was she wrong, she was clueless . Today, the Obama Administration announced that it was pressing ahead with its plan to require contraceptives, sterilization, and abortifacients to be included in all medical plans by the mechanism of having the insurance carrier provide those services for &#8220;free&#8221; regardless if the policy held by an employer covered those items. Who was first in line to affix herself to Obama&#8217;s fourth point of contact: none other than the egregiously stupid Carol Keehan. Really one shouldn&#8217;t be surprised at this. In the interview linked above, Keehan basically endorses abortion: Why did the U.S. bishops and other pro-life leaders oppose the final legislation&#8217;s approach to abortion? Many people are uncomfortable with it because it will allow more people to be in plans that cover abortion, even though no federal dollars are used. That is not a happy thought. On the other hand, it is also not a happy thought that women who are at 300 percent of the poverty level and below have abortions at four times the rate of women in any other socioeconomic group. We haven&#8217;t found ways to reach out to those women. Lest you think I am unfair to Keehan, you need only to read her objection to HHS allowing minors to buy the abortifacient &#8220;Plan B.&#8221; Back in December 2010, Bishop Thomas Olmsted of Phoenix withdrew Catholic standing from St. Joseph&#8217;s Hospital in Phoenix and formally excommunicated Sister Margaret McBride for conducting at least one abortion at the hospital. Naturally, Keehan weighed in against the Bishop and the opinion of the actual doctor who advised the diocese on the matter. Again and again we are seeing this behavior by a disturbing number of Catholics who really should know better. Their romance with Obama has become their lodestar and if endorsing abortion and inviting someone who declared that killing a child who had survived an abortion was just dandy to give a commencement address at Notre Dame was what it took to get that leg tingling then so be it. These people may not yet be as vile as the kapos who led fellow prisoners to the gas chambers but they are certainly the philosophical fellow travelers of Pierre Laval and Vidkun Quisling. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/return-of-the-vichy-catholics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watchdog Group Obtains FOIA Documents Revealing DHS Monitoring Political Dissent Online…</title>
		<link>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/watchdog-group-obtains-foia-documents-revealing-dhs-monitoring-political-dissent-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/watchdog-group-obtains-foia-documents-revealing-dhs-monitoring-political-dissent-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FlodinCeglinski711</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media-content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy-information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weasel wonk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/watchdog-group-obtains-foia-documents-revealing-dhs-monitoring-political-dissent-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC): EPIC is pursuing a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for information about the agency&#8217;s surveillance of social networks and news organizations. In February 2011, the Department of Homeland Security announced that the agency planned to implement a program that would monitor media content, ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obamashitlist.com/2012/02/10/watchdog-group-obtains-foia-documents-revealing-dhs-monitoring-political-dissent-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

